🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of states are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". A law could be enacted soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban is "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked the legislature to pass a bill raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a related action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged guardians to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a symbolic statement demanding a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is provided. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a useful starting point," said a leading parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Previously, support built behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after viewing disturbing platform posts contends that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are safe and fit for minors," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, regulation is primarily occurring at the state government level amid federal gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional use requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures requiring guardian approval for under-16s to open social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from some politicians to follow the Australian path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Beyond these regions, additional states are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world organizations take a more measured position. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The agency notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this international conversation continues, the policies of this nation and several other countries indicate that states internationally are no longer willing to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.